Behind the Whistle: Former Premier League referee Chris Foy explains the latest EFL decisions | Football News happymamay

Behind Safra, Chris Voy passes the former English Premier League referee with a choice of the main match decisions from EFL work on the weekend.

Safra aims to grant supporters of EFL clubs insight into decision -making considerations and also clarifying certain calls to provide an understanding of how to explain the laws of the game.

As part of a regular feature on Sky Sports after the end of the match, FOY will be here to run you through some issues in EFL …

Swansea 0-2 Coventry

incident: The goal scored, handball is possible (Swansea)

resolution: The goal is not allowed, handball

Foy says: “It is good to see the speed of the reaction and the meat shown from the ruling to determine the crime of this handball.

“When the ball comes from the corner, it is clear that it strikes the arm of Swansea No. 5 before his teammate in the back kick it will not be punished because the Swansea number does not score the goal.

“Since the arm is an abnormal and raised position, which makes the body larger, the target is properly excluded for handball crime.”

Watford 0-1 Norwich

incident: A possible penalty kick and a red card (Norwich)

resolution: Free kick and cautious

Foy says: “The ruling has two important decisions to make here.

First, he must decide whether or not the sinner on Norwich City 9 is outside the box or not. Thanks to its movement and location, it can determine that the contact takes off outside the box, and thus is granted for free -having to Norwich.

After that, he must decide whether the error has denied the clear opportunity to score goals (Dogso). From restart, we can see that the striker in Norwich has the ball under control while moving towards the goal, and that he has a clear opportunity to get a shot on the goal .

“Therefore, the referee must have shown a Watford player with a red card for Mujo.”

Crole 1-2 Wrexham

incident: A possible construction error to the goal (Wrexham)

resolution: The granted goal

Foy says: “Wrexham was lucky for this goal to stand, as the number 38 of his opponent clearly before heading to the network.

“When the ball is played widely, the referee must make a scan to the middle to find out what is going on inside the crowded box.

“By focusing on the player who crosses the ball, he is absent from the continuous reservation by Wrexham’s No 38 on his opponent. The clouds were influential and the threshold was made for a mistake. So a free defensive free kick should have been given.”

Read 1-0 Bolton

incident: Possible penalty kick, handball (reading)

resolution: A penalty granted

Foy says: “Although this seems somewhat harmful, the correct decision by the ruling is to give a handball penalty reading.

“When the ball floats in the area, the 29th in Bolton goes to the head of the ball away, and contacts the ball with his outstretched arm.

“The arm is in an abnormal and unjustified position, so the punishment is the right result.”

Doncaster 2-1 MK Dons

incident: The target scored, potential infiltration (Doncaster)

resolution: The granted goal

Foy says: “The infiltration decisions in which the defenders ascend and try to play the attackers to infiltrate alongside the assistant rulers to rule, but he gets this place.

“Since Doncaster’s no 9 runs the goal, MK Dons’ 26 tries to play on the side.

“When the image crosses at this pace, it makes the ruling more difficult, but it works well here.”