Vance took the lead attacking Zelensky. Why? happymamay

The wonderful dressing of JD Vance at Voludimir Zelinski at the Oval Office on Friday showed that the Vice President of the United States is not afraid that the lead center will occupy as an attack dog, instead of presenting it like some of his predecessors as a self -political leader.

Vance was the one who led the attack on Zelinski before Donald Trump joined the battle in the White House in a friendly meeting until the vice president spoke to the president to discuss what he described as a diplomatic solution to the Ukraine war Russia.

“What kind of diplomacy, dinars, are you talking?” Zelinski, who was criticizing the direct talks between Washington and Moscow, said. “What do you mean?”

“I am talking about the type of diplomacy that will end the destruction of your country,” Vans answered the amazing Ukrainian leader.

“Mr. President, with respect, I think it is not respectable to come to the Oval Office to try to litigate this in front of the American media.”

Zelinski was also accused of the campaign on behalf of the Democrats during the 2024 presidential elections. The Ukrainian leader visited an ammunition factory in the decisive Pennsylvania state last September, and the Trump competitor, Kamala Harris, met at the White House.

Vans formed Zelensky with wide support among Republicans.

“I was very proud of JD Vance in our country,” said Senator South Carolina Lindsey Graham, a long -standing defender of Ukraine. Suggest that Zelensky should resign.

Senator Alabama Tommy Tobreville referred to Zelinski in the name of “that is the Ukrainian wedding.”

The New York Lawyer Mike’s Congress Mike was measured, saying that the meeting was “a lost opportunity for both the United States and Ukraine.”

Vans wonderful attack on the visiting head of state is not typical for the US Vice President.

They are often their job – but not always – to help elect the president and then sit quietly alongside their president. To be a loyal lieutenant representing the president on foreign trips – standing alongside heartbeat, so they say, from the presidency.

In contrast to Trump’s first vice president, Mike Pines was not more dependent.

But Vans – who is widely seen as working to express the logical basis behind Trump’s foreign policy instincts – has long been skeptical of American aid to Ukraine.

When he was running for the Senate in Ohio in 2022, he told Vans Podcast: “I must be honest with you. I don’t really care about what happens to Ukraine in one way or another.”

Vice President Trump mocked him as a fool eight years ago, before being crowned by a political development that has reached a clear heir to the President’s movement that makes America great again.

Despite the popularity of Vans among conservative voters, Trump recently said in an interview with Fox News that he was “very early” to know whether the vice president will be in the next line to run for the presidency in 2028.

Vans seems to be not prepared, as he develops a role as a political stone for Trump, and goes beyond the president in his explicit criticism of the administration.

One of the common threads is that many victims of the tongue of Vans are America’s allies.

It started at the Munich Security Conference last month, a regular port to invite the Vice President of the United States. Kamala Harris often gives an unforgettable speaker there.

But Vans used this occasion to launch a strict attack on the state of European democracy, accusing continental leaders of controlling freedom of expression and their failure to control immigration.

“If you are afraid of voters, there is nothing that America can do for you,” he said.

The fans of politicians, generals and diplomats were terrified.

This was not the usual argument – and now widely – that Europe should do more to pay for its defense and security.

This was a complete ideological attack-a sign that the United States under the leadership of Mr. Trump is not just a axis away from Europe, and its security focus turned into China, but it also seeks to promote its people like Trump in the European continent.

Not for nothing eating dinner after his speech with the right -wing AFD leadership in Germany.

His speech sparked a violent reaction from European leaders, writers and academics.

However, Vans chose to take them online, as he participates in a detailed X exchange with many, including the historian, Niall Ferguson.

Vans accused him of “moral garbage”, “historical illiteracy” and – the worst ever – being “globalization”.

If this is not enough, Vans chose to go to the UK Prime Minister at the same oval office earlier this week.

From nothing, Sir Kerr Starmer told that “there were violations of freedom of expression that did not actually affect the British – of course what the British do in their country – but also affects American technology companies, and thus American citizens.”

The Prime Minister retracted, saying: “With regard to freedom of expression in the United Kingdom, I am very proud of our history there … We have received freedom of expression for a very long time in the UK and will continue for a very long time.”

This was the resonance of the criticism made by Vans in Munich, where he was moving against European regulations on artificial intelligence platforms and social media.

The goal is to address misleading information and hate speech that can provoke disorders and radicalism. Vans sees it as a threat to political travelers and American commercial interests, especially in large technology.

Many questions provide themselves. Was Vans’s attack on Zelensky intentionally, as some diplomats believe?

White House sources told our papers that it was not.

Is the new role of Vans arises at the request of Trump, as the pregnancy with Elon Musk shares to reduce the punishment for the president’s opponents?

Or is Vance Freelancening already a role that is the basis for an electoral campaign within three years when Trump will not be able to stand again?

Whatever the answers to these questions, Vans appear more than just Trump.