Behind the Whistle: Former Premier League referee Chris Foy explains the latest EFL decisions | Football News happymamay

Beyond the whistle, Chris Foy, the former English Premier League referee, passes through the main matches decisions of the latest procedures in the Sky Bet championship, the first league and the second league.

Safra aims to grant supporters of EFL clubs insight into decision -making considerations and also clarifying certain calls to provide an understanding of how to explain the laws of the game.

As part of a regular feature on Sky Sports after the end of the match, FOY will be here to run you through some issues in EFL …

Sheffield Wednesday 1-2 Sunderland

incident: The goal scored, handball is possible (Sunderland)

resolution: The target was granted (Sunderland)

Foy says: Unfortunately, the referee does not specify that the ball hit the Sunderland #12 before it continues to score.

“It is clear that the return is that, since the ball is transmitted over the upper part, it strikes the left arm in front of Sunderland. Although it is a cross ball, the same striker immediately, which means that the goal should not be allowed.

“The correct result here was to give a free defensive kick.”

Birmingham city 1-0 Wycombe Wandeers

incident: Possible red card, a dangerous dangerous play (Wycombe Wandeers)

resolution: Red Card (Wycombe Wandeers) granted

Foy says: “In my opinion, the referee gets this place completely. While the Wycombe Wandorers comes and faces a challenge in speed, he clearly lacks the ball and holds his opponent.

“It was easy for the ruling to simply show a yellow card for the satirical nature of the treatment, however, it is correct to properly determine that the treatment meets with the dangerous threshold.

“The challenge has a high speed and intensity, and therefore it is a good decision to show the red card because it shows the integrity of the opponent.”

Peteroro United 3-1 Circassian city

incident: A possible red card, violent behavior (Sharrbury City)

resolution: Red Card, Violent behavior (Charssbury City)

Foy says: “When the ball is played for a long time from the start of Cruisbery, 27 raises his arm in the neck of his opponent, which is located on the ground.

“We can see from the angle of closeness that the arm has been raised and it seems that it hunts the opponent by force. The ruling does not appear any hesitation in withdrawing the red card, which is the correct decision in the end.”

Shallitham City 1-1 Grimpsopy City

incident: Possible penalty kick, handball (Shallitham town)

resolution: A penalty kick (Town Ciltnham) is granted

Foy says: “If you want to do the forensic analysis of this incident, it will be clear to everyone that it is a clear hand penalty, but I actually think it is a great place by the ruling in a crowded area.

“While playing the ball in the box, Grimsby Town No. 5 raised his hand over his head and touched with the ball. With an arm in an abnormal and unjustified position, he could not have any complaints when a penalty kick is given.

“For me, the referee deserves praise here because the Town player in Shallitham is close to the head of the ball, in front of the handball site directly. With many players in the region and a vision is likely to hinder it, it works well to remain calm and indicates the place.”